CladisticsVolume 10, Issue 3 p. 315-319 Free Access TESTING SIGNIFICANCE OF INCONGRUENCE James S. Farris, James S. Farris Naturhistoriska riksmuseet, Molekylärystematiska laboratoriet, Box 50007, S-104 05, Stockholm, Sweden Department of Entomology, American Museum of Natural History, Central Park West at 79th St., New York, New York 10024, U.S.A.Search for more papers by this authorMari Källersjö, Mari Källersjö Naturhistoriska riksmuseet, Molekylärystematiska laboratoriet, Box 50007, S-104 05, Stockholm, SwedenSearch for more papers by this authorArnold G. Kluge, Arnold G. Kluge Department of Reptiles and Amphibians, Museum of Zoology, The University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan 48109, U.S.A.Search for more papers by this authorCarol Bult, Carol Bult Institute of Genomic Research, 932 Clopper Rd., Gaithersburg, Maryland 20878, U.S.A.Search for more papers by this author James S. Farris, James S. Farris Naturhistoriska riksmuseet, Molekylärystematiska laboratoriet, Box 50007, S-104 05, Stockholm, Sweden Department of Entomology, American Museum of Natural History, Central Park West at 79th St., New York, New York 10024, U.S.A.Search for more papers by this authorMari Källersjö, Mari Källersjö Naturhistoriska riksmuseet, Molekylärystematiska laboratoriet, Box 50007, S-104 05, Stockholm, SwedenSearch for more papers by this authorArnold G. Kluge, Arnold G. Kluge Department of Reptiles and Amphibians, Museum of Zoology, The University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan 48109, U.S.A.Search for more papers by this authorCarol Bult, Carol Bult Institute of Genomic Research, 932 Clopper Rd., Gaithersburg, Maryland 20878, U.S.A.Search for more papers by this author First published: September 1994 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1096-0031.1994.tb00181.xCitations: 2,887AboutPDF ToolsRequest permissionExport citationAdd to favoritesTrack citation ShareShare Give accessShare full text accessShare full-text accessPlease review our Terms and Conditions of Use and check box below to share full-text version of article.I have read and accept the Wiley Online Library Terms and Conditions of UseShareable LinkUse the link below to share a full-text version of this article with your friends and colleagues. Learn more.Copy URL Share a linkShare onFacebookTwitterLinkedInRedditWechat REFERENCES Bremer, K. 1988. The limits of amino-acid sequence data in angiosperm phylogenetic reconstruction. Evolution, 42: 795– 803. Bremer, B. and L. Struwe. 1992. Phylogeny of the Rubiaceae and the Loganiaceae: congruence or conflict between morphological and molecular data Amer. Jour. Bot., 79: 1171– 1184. Bruneau, A. and E. E. Dickson. 1995. Congruence of chloroplast DNA restriction site characters with morphological and isozyme data in Solatium sect. Lasiocarpa. Can. Jour. Bot. (in press). Farris, J. S., M. Kallersjo, A. G. Kluge and C. Bult. 1994. Permutations. Cladistics, 10: 65– 76. Kluge, A. G. 1989. A concern for evidence and a phylogenetic hypothesis of relationships among Epicrates (Boidae, Serpentes). Syst. Zool., 38: 7– 25. Kallersjo, M., J. S. Farris, A. G. Kluge and C. Bult. 1992. Skewness and permutation. Cladistics, 8: 275– 287. Lindgren, B. W. 1962. Statistical Theory. MacMillan, New York . Mickevich, M. F. and J. S. Farris. 1981. The implications of congruence in Menidia. Syst. Zool., 30: 351– 370. Miyamoto, M. 1985. Consensus cladograms and general classifications. Cladistics, 1: 186– 189. Schuh, R. T. and J. S. Farris. 1981. Methods for investigating taxonomic congruence and their application to the Leptopodomorpha. Syst. Zool., 30: 331– 351. Smith, J. F. and K. J. Sytsma. 1994. Molecules and morphology: congruence of data in Columnea (Gesneriaceae). Plant Syst. Evol. (in press). Swofford, D. L. 1991. When are phylogeny estimates from molecular and morphological data incongruent? In M. M. Miyamoto and J. Cracraft, (eds), Phylogenetic Analysis of DNA Sequences. Oxford Univ. Press, New York , pp. 295– 333. Tehler, A. 1994. Cladistic analysis in ascomycete systematics: Theory and practice. In D. L. Hawksworth, (ed.), Ascomycete Systematics: Problems and Perspectives in the 90s. Plenum, New York , pp. 185– 197. Tehler, A. 1995a. Arthionales phylogeny as indicated by morphological and rDNA sequence data. Cryptogamic Botany (in press). Tehler, A. 1995b. Morphological data, molecular data, and total evidence in phylogenetic analysis. Can. Jour. Bot. (in press). Citing Literature Volume10, Issue3September 1994Pages 315-319 ReferencesRelatedInformation