Swarming is a macroscopic phenomenon in which surface bacteria organize into a motile population. The flagellar motor that drives swarming in Pseudomonas aeruginosa is powered by stators MotAB and MotCD. Deletion of the MotCD stator eliminates swarming, whereas deletion of the MotAB stator enhances swarming. Interestingly, we measured a strongly asymmetric stator availability in the WT strain, with MotAB stators produced ∼40-fold more than MotCD stators. However, recruitment of MotCD stators in free swimming cells requires higher liquid viscosities, while MotAB stators are readily recruited at low viscosities. Importantly, we find that cells with MotCD stators are ∼10x more likely to have an active motor compared to cells without, so wild-type, WT, populations are intrinsically heterogeneous and not reducible to MotAB-dominant or MotCD-dominant behavior. The spectrum of motility intermittency can either cooperatively shut down or promote flagellum motility in WT populations. In P. aeruginosa , transition from a static solid-like biofilm to a dynamic liquid-like swarm is not achieved at a single critical value of flagellum torque or stator fraction but is collectively controlled by diverse combinations of flagellum activities and motor intermittencies via dynamic stator recruitment. Experimental and computational results indicate that the initiation or arrest of flagellum-driven swarming motility does not occur from individual fitness or motility performance but rather related to concepts from the 'jamming transition' in active granular matter.After extensive study, it is now known that there exist multifactorial influences on swarming motility in P. aeruginosa , but it is not clear precisely why stator selection in the flagellum motor is so important or how this process is collectively initiated or arrested. Here, we show that for P. aeruginosa PA14, MotAB stators are produced ∼40-fold more than MotCD stators, but recruitment of MotCD over MotAB stators requires higher liquid viscosities. Moreover, we find the unanticipated result that the two motor configurations have significantly different motor intermittencies, the fraction of flagellum-active cells in a population on average, with MotCD active ∼10x more often than MotAB. What emerges from this complex landscape of stator recruitment and resultant motor output is an intrinsically heterogeneous population of motile cells. We show how consequences of stator recruitment led to swarming motility, and how they potentially relate to surface sensing circuitry.