Unsupervised sequence models for protein fitness have emerged as powerful tools for protein design in order to engineer therapeutics and industrial enzymes, yet they are strongly biased towards potential designs that are close to their training data. This hinders their ability to generate functional sequences that are far away from natural sequences, as is often desired to design new functions. To address this problem, we introduce a de-biasing approach that enables the comparison of protein sequences across mutational depths to overcome the extant sequence similarity bias in natural sequence models. We demonstrate our method9s effectiveness at improving the relative natural sequence model predictions of experimentally measured variant functions across mutational depths. Using case studies proteins with very low functional percentages further away from the wild type, we demonstrate that our method improves the recovery of top-performing variants in these sparsely functional regimes. Our method is generally applicable to any unsupervised fitness prediction model, and for any function for any protein, and can thus easily be incorporated into any computational protein design pipeline. These studies have the potential to develop more efficient and cost-effective computational methods for designing diverse functional proteins and to inform underlying experimental library design to best take advantage of machine learning capabilities.

Removing bias in sequence models of protein fitness