Abstract

Spliceosomal introns, which interrupt nuclear genes and are removed from RNA transcripts by machinery termed spliceosomes, are ubiquitous features of eukaryotic nuclear genes [1]. Patterns of spliceosomal intron evolution are complex, with some lineages exhibiting virtually no intron creation while others experience thousands of intron gains [2-5]. One possibility is that this punctate phylogenetic distribution is explained by intron creation by Introner-Like Elements (ILEs), transposable elements capable of creating introns, with only those lineages harboring ILEs undergoing massive intron gain [6-10]. However, ILEs have been reported in only four lineages. Here we study intron evolution in dinoflagellates. The remarkable fragmentation of nuclear genes by spliceosomal introns reaches its apex in dinoflagellates, which have some twenty introns per gene [11,12]. Despite this, almost nothing is known about the molecular and evolutionary mechanisms governing dinoflagellate intron evolution. We reconstructed intron evolution in five dinoflagellate genomes, revealing a dynamic history of intron loss and gain. ILEs are found in 4/5 studied species. In one species, Polarella glacialis, we find an unprecedented diversity of ILEs, with ILE insertion leading to creation of some 12,253 introns, and with 15 separate families of ILEs accounting for at least 100 introns each. These ILE families range in mobilization mechanism, mechanism of intron creation, and flexibility of mechanism of intron creation. Comparison within and between ILE families provides evidence that biases in so-called intron phase, the distribution of introns relative to codon periodicity, are driven by ILE insertion site requirements [9,13,14]. Finally, we find evidence for multiple additional transformations of the spliceosomal system in dinoflagellates, including widespread loss of ancestral introns, and alterations in required, tolerated and favored splice motifs. These results reveal unappreciated intron creating elements diversity and spliceosomal evolutionary capacity, and suggest complex evolutionary dependencies shaping genome structures.