ABSTRACT Premise of the study Evolutionary relationships in the species-rich Orchidaceae have historically relied on organellar DNA sequences and limited taxon sampling. Previous studies provided a robust plastid-maternal phylogenetic framework, from which multiple hypotheses on the drivers of orchid diversification have been derived. However, the extent to which the maternal evolutionary history of orchids is congruent with that of the nuclear genome has remained uninvestigated. Methods We inferred phylogenetic relationships from 294 low-copy nuclear genes sequenced/obtained using the Angiosperms353 universal probe set from 75 species representing 69 genera, 16 tribes and 24 subtribes. To test for topological incongruence between nuclear and plastid genomes, we constructed a tree from 78 plastid genes, representing 117 genera, 18 tribes and 28 subtribes and compared them using a co-phylogenetic approach. The phylogenetic informativeness and support of the Angiosperms353 loci were compared with those of the 78 plastid genes. Key Results Phylogenetic inferences of nuclear datasets produced highly congruent and robustly supported orchid relationships. Comparisons of nuclear gene trees and plastid gene trees using the latest co-phylogenetic tools revealed strongly supported phylogenetic incongruence in both shallow and deep time. Phylogenetic informativeness analyses showed that the Angiosperms353 genes were in general more informative than most plastid genes. Conclusions Our study provides the first robust nuclear phylogenomic framework for Orchidaceae plus an assessment of intragenomic nuclear discordance, plastid-nuclear tree incongruence, and phylogenetic informativeness across the family. Our results also demonstrate what has long been known but rarely documented: nuclear and plastid phylogenetic trees are not fully congruent and therefore should not be considered interchangeable.

Hundreds of nuclear and plastid loci yield insights into orchid relationships