Abstract

Summary A wide range of SARS-CoV-2 neutralizing monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) were reported to date, most of which target the spike glycoprotein and in particular its receptor binding domain (RBD) and N-terminal domain (NTD) of the S1 subunit. The therapeutic implementation of these antibodies has been recently challenged by emerging SARS-CoV-2 variants that harbor extensively mutated spike versions. Consequently, the re-assessment of mAbs, previously reported to neutralize the original early-version of the virus, is of high priority. Four previously selected mAbs targeting non-overlapping epitopes, were evaluated for their binding potency to RBD versions harboring individual mutations at spike positions 417, 439, 453, 477, 484 and 501. Mutations at these positions represent the prevailing worldwide distributed modifications of the RBD, previously reported to mediate escape from antibody neutralization. Additionally, the in vitro neutralization potencies of the four RBD-specific mAbs, as well as two NTD-specific mAbs, were evaluated against two frequent SARS-CoV-2 variants of concern (VOCs): (i) the B.1.1.7 variant, emerged in the UK and (ii) the B.1.351 variant, emerged in South Africa. Variant B.1.351 was previously suggested to escape many therapeutic mAbs, including those authorized for clinical use. The possible impact of RBD mutations on recognition by mAbs is addressed by comparative structural modelling. Finally, we demonstrate the therapeutic potential of three selected mAbs by treatment of K18-hACE2 transgenic mice two days post infection with each of the virus strains. Our results clearly indicate that despite the accumulation of spike mutations, some neutralizing mAbs preserve their potency against SARS-CoV-2. In particular, the highly potent MD65 and BL6 mAbs are shown to retain their ability to bind the prevalent novel viral mutations and to effectively protect against B.1.1.7 and B.1.351 variants of high clinical concern.

Paper PDF

This paper's license is marked as closed access or non-commercial and cannot be viewed on ResearchHub. Visit the paper's external site.