Abstract The question of whether repeated studies bring more variability or less to our brain is a critical problem before scientist continue their further study about memory. In the past ten years, a series of neural pattern representation studies have found that under the condition of spaced learning, the neural pattern similarity(NPS) between two encoding stages increases, and the researchers claimed that these results support the idea that repeated studies bring more similarity along with repetition in our brain, which is conflicted with the encoding variability theory(Feng et al., 2019; Y. Lu et al., 2015; Xue et al., 2010, 2011a). However, we doubt this viewpoint because we think the difference between encoding processing cannot be used to represent the difference between memory states. In current experiments, we used a new experimental paradigm with a longer lag and elaboration learning task to test the encoding variability theory. By comparing the difference between neural pattern dissimilarity(NPDS1)(spaced learning - one-time learning) and NPDS2(massed learning - one-time learning) in the final test (retrieval) stage, we get the result that the NPDS1 was significantly greater than NPDS2 in the parietal lobe of 400ms and the right frontal lobe of 600ms, which is more fitting to the encoding variability mechanism. However, we believe that there is no contradiction between these two experimental evidences. On the contrary, we think they reflect different aspects of the process of spaced learning. We propose that the deficient processing in encoding stage exactly lead to less encoding variability in our memory. More importantly, this result gives us reason to double the paper published ten years ago in Science, which claimed repetition brings greater neural pattern similarity.

Greater Neural Pattern Dissimilarity and Higher Meaningfulness in the Retrieval Stage are Enhanced by Spaced Learning