Abstract

Turboprop aircrafts are typically used for transporting cargos and for low-capacity short-haul air transport between regional cities. The new designs of turboprop aircrafts tend to focus on noise and comfort level of the aircrafts. Although turboprop aircrafts are known to have relatively higher cabin noise, there are limited reported studies in the open literature examining the actual cabin noise level in commercial flights. In this study, the cabin noise of the ATR 72-500 turboprop aircraft was examined and compared with that of the Bombardier CRJ 900 turbofan aircraft during actual commercial flights. Both are passenger planes which are designed to carry fewer than 100 passengers and are deemed to be a more compatible comparison. Both are single isle aircraft with two seats on each side of the isle. The Bombardier CRJ 900 is found to have a lower cabin noise in terms of both dBA and dBC for both taxing and cruising. As the average equivalent continuous sound pressure level (Leq) for cabin noise is found to be well below 85 dBA, there is no risk of exceeding the daily exposure to noise of 85 dBA for eight hours under the National Institute for Occupational Safety & Health (NIOSH) regulation. However, as many reported studies have shown that prolonged exposure to low frequency noise may lead to disorders, discomfort, sensitivity to and irritability from noise, annoyance, hearing loss, and cardiovascular diseases, there may be a need to carry out a more detailed study of the effect of low frequency noise on passengers.