Abstract

Inhibiting ENaC in the airways of people with cystic fibrosis (pwCF) is hypothesized to enhance mucociliary clearance (MCC) and provide clinical benefit. Historically, inhaled ENaC blockers have failed to show benefit in pwCF challenging this hypothesis. It is however unknown whether the clinical doses were sufficient to provide the required long duration of action in the lungs and questions whether a novel candidate could offer advantages where others have failed?