Abstract

Abstract Background Non‐operative management of splenic injuries has significantly increased in the last decade with an increased emphasis on splenic preservation. This shift was assisted by increased availability of angioembolization, however, potential geographical variability in access exists in Aotearoa New Zealand (AoNZ). The aim of this study was to assess the management of splenic injury across AoNZ. Method Five‐year retrospective study of all patients admitted to AoNZ hospitals with blunt major trauma and a splenic injury. Patients were identified using the National Trauma Registry and cross‐referenced with the National Minimum Data Set to determine their management. The primary outcome was the non‐operative rate. Results Seven hundred seventy‐three patients were included. Four hundred sixty‐nine presented to a tertiary major trauma hospital and 304 to a secondary major trauma hospital. A difference was found in the rate of non‐operative management between tertiary and secondary hospitals ( P = 0.019). The rate of non‐operative management was similar in mild ( P = 0.814) and moderate ( P = 0.825) injuries, however, significantly higher in severe injuries in tertiary hospitals ( P = 0.009). No difference in mortality rate was found. Conclusion This study found a difference in the management of splenic injuries between tertiary and secondary major trauma hospitals; predominantly due to a higher rate of operative management in patients with severe injuries at secondary hospitals. Despite this, no difference in mortality rate was found between tertiary and secondary hospitals.