Abstract

The T-cell receptor (TCR) triggers the elimination of pathogens and tumors by T lymphocytes. In order for this to avoid damage to the host, the receptor has to discriminate between thousands of peptide ligands presented by each host cell. Exactly how the TCR does this is unknown. In resting T-cells, the TCR is largely unphosphorylated due to the dominance of phosphatases over kinases expressed at the cell surface. When agonist peptides are presented to the TCR by major histocompatibility complex (MHC) proteins expressed by antigen-presenting cells (APCs), very fast receptor triggering occurs, leading to TCR phosphorylation. Recent work suggests that this depends on the local exclusion of the phosphatases from regions of contact of the T cells with the APCs. Here, we develop and test a quantitative treatment of receptor triggering reliant only upon TCR dwell-time in phosphatase-depleted cell-cell contacts constrained in area by cell topography. Using the model and experimentally-derived parameters, we find that ligand discrimination is possible but that it depends crucially on individual contacts being 400 nm in diameter or smaller, i.e. the size generated by microvilli. The model not only correctly predicts the relative signaling potencies of known agonists and non-agonists, but achieves this in the absence of conventional, multi-step kinetic proof-reading. Our work provides a simple, quantitative and predictive molecular framework for understanding why TCR triggering is so selective and fast, and reveals that for some receptors, cell topography crucially influences signaling outcomes.\n\nSignificance statementOne approach to testing biological theories is to determine if they are predictive. A simple, theoretical treatment of TCR triggering suggests that ligand discrimination by the receptor relies on just two physical principles: (1) the time TCRs spend in cell-cell contacts depleted of large tyrosine phosphatases; and (2) constraints on contact size imposed by T cells using finger-like protrusions to interrogate their targets. The theory not only allows agonistic and non-agonistic TCR ligands to be distinguished but predicts the relative signalling potencies of agonists with remarkable accuracy. This suggests that the theory captures the essential features of receptor triggering.