Animals often navigate environments that are uncertain, volatile and complex, making it challenging to locate reliable food sources. Therefore, it is not surprising that many species evolved multiple, parallel and complementary foraging strategies to survive. Current research on animal behavior is largely driven by a reductionist approach and attempts to study one particular aspect of behavior in isolation. This is justified by the huge success of past and current research in understanding neural circuit mechanisms of behaviors. But focusing on only one aspect of behaviors obscures their inherent multidimensional nature. To fill this gap we aimed to identify and characterize distinct behavioral modules using a simple reward foraging assay. For this we developed a single-animal, trial-based probabilistic foraging task, where freely walking fruit flies experience optogenetic sugar-receptor neuron stimulation. By carefully analyzing the walking trajectories of flies, we were able to dissect the animals foraging decisions into multiple underlying systems. We show that flies perform local searches, cue-based navigation and learn task relevant contingencies. Using probabilistic reward delivery allowed us to bid several competing reinforcement learning (RL) models against each other. We discover that flies accumulate chosen option values, forget unchosen option values and seek novelty. We further show that distinct behavioral modules -learning and navigation-based systems- cooperate, suggesting that reinforcement learning in flies operates on dimensionality reduced representations. We therefore argue that animals will apply combinations of multiple behavioral strategies to generate foraging decisions.

Foraging fruit flies mix navigational and learning-based decision-making strategies