Fetal hemoglobin (HbF) reactivation expression through CRISPR-Cas9 is a promising strategy for the treatment of sickle cell disease (SCD). Here, we describe a genome editing strategy leading to reactivation of HbF expression by targeting the binding sites (BSs) for the lymphoma-related factor (LRF) repressor in the γ-globin promoters. CRISPR-Cas9 treatment in healthy donor (HD) and patient-derived HSPCs resulted in a high frequency of LRF BS disruption and potent HbF synthesis in their erythroid progeny. LRF BS disruption did not impair HSPC engraftment and differentiation but was more efficient in SCD than in HD cells. However, SCD HSPCs showed a reduced engraftment and a myeloid bias compared with HD cells. We detected off-target activity and chromosomal rearrangements, particularly in SCD samples (likely because of the higher overall editing efficiency) but did not impact the target gene expression and HSPC engraftment and differentiation. Transcriptomic analyses showed that the editing procedure results in the up-regulation of genes involved in DNA damage and inflammatory responses, which was more evident in SCD HSPCs. This study provides evidence of efficacy and safety for an editing strategy based on HbF reactivation and highlights the need of performing safety studies in clinically relevant conditions, i.e., in patient-derived HSPCs. Fetal hemoglobin (HbF) reactivation expression through CRISPR-Cas9 is a promising strategy for the treatment of sickle cell disease (SCD). Here, we describe a genome editing strategy leading to reactivation of HbF expression by targeting the binding sites (BSs) for the lymphoma-related factor (LRF) repressor in the γ-globin promoters. CRISPR-Cas9 treatment in healthy donor (HD) and patient-derived HSPCs resulted in a high frequency of LRF BS disruption and potent HbF synthesis in their erythroid progeny. LRF BS disruption did not impair HSPC engraftment and differentiation but was more efficient in SCD than in HD cells. However, SCD HSPCs showed a reduced engraftment and a myeloid bias compared with HD cells. We detected off-target activity and chromosomal rearrangements, particularly in SCD samples (likely because of the higher overall editing efficiency) but did not impact the target gene expression and HSPC engraftment and differentiation. Transcriptomic analyses showed that the editing procedure results in the up-regulation of genes involved in DNA damage and inflammatory responses, which was more evident in SCD HSPCs. This study provides evidence of efficacy and safety for an editing strategy based on HbF reactivation and highlights the need of performing safety studies in clinically relevant conditions, i.e., in patient-derived HSPCs.

Safety and efficacy studies of CRISPR-Cas9 treatment of sickle cell disease highlights disease-specific responses