Abstract Background Sustained monomorphic ventricular tachycardia (SMVT) is the most common ventricular arrhythmia (VA) subtype in patients with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM) who have received an implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD). However, data on catheter ablation (CA) are limited and available series typically report results of non-genotyped patients with relatively mild hypertrophy and/or apical aneurysms. Purpose This study describes genotype, phenotype and outcome of consecutive HCM patients referred for CA ablation of refractory SMVT. Methods and results Nine out of 787 patients referred for catheter ablation of SMVT between 01/2016 – 10/2023 had a HCM phenotype, 8/9 with dominant septal hypertrophy, none with LV outflow tract obstruction, and only 1/9 with an apical aneurysm. The median maximal wall thickness was 25 mm (IQR 20,2 – 26,9 mm) and the median left ventricular ejection fraction 34 % (IQR 26-42%). Six patients had a class IV/V variant in the myosine binding protein C (MYBPC3) gene, in 3 no disease-causing variant was identified. All patients with MYBPC3 mutation presented with an electrical storm/incessant VT refractory to antiarrhythmic drugs (AAD), including amiodarone (6/6) and amiodarone + class I AAD (3/6). In an attempt to control VT, 4/6 patients with a MYBPC3 variant required ≥2 ablation including bail out strategies (transcoronary alcohol-ablation, bipolar ablation, half-saline), surgical substrate resection and intraoperative cryoablation (3/6) and radiotherapy (2/6). After a median follow-up of 25 months (IQR 2-75) after the last intervention, all patients with MYBPC3-variants had VT recurrence, 3/6 died and 1/6 underwent heart transplantation. In contrast, patients without class IV/V variants, did not require bail-out strategies; VT recurred in one (single episode) and one patient died, 24 months after CA. The time course of the disease, management and outcome for patients with and without disease causing mutation is illustrated, with the first ablation as center line (figure). Conclusions Only 1 % of patients referred for CA of SMVT to a high-volume center had a HCM phenotype. A MYBPC3 variant was identified in 67%, and, in contrast to prior reports, 89% had severe hypertrophy. VT free survival appears to be particularly poor in MYBPC3 variant carriers despite availability of all treatment modalities. In these patients, early screening for advanced heart failure management including heart transplantation is important.

Genotype, phenotype and outcomes of patients with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy referred for ablation of ventricular tachycardia