Abstract Stagnation pressure loss coefficient is still the most commonly used loss metric for performance evaluation and is routinely used to validate simulations. This is because it is easy to measure and readily available from the experiments. However, it was previously shown (TURBO-24-1006) that the stagnation pressure loss coefficient can become unreliable when high levels of inflow unsteadiness are present. As the current design trends are moving towards more compact machines and higher work coefficients, the levels of unsteadiness are likely to increase. It is therefore desirable to assess how higher inflow unsteadiness levels affect the performance of new blade designs and what loss metrics should be used to reliably estimate it. Motivated by the need to understand how performance prediction changes under highly unsteady inflow conditions, we perform a series of high fidelity scale resolving simulations. We use this data to construct energy budgets for a variety of mid-span compressor cases with varying Reynolds numbers and inflow turbulence intensities. This allows us to systematically assess the impact of inflow conditions on loss prediction when using stagnation pressure based loss metrics. Stagnation pressure loss coefficient was found to be least reliable for the high inflow turbulence intensities and at high Reynolds numbers.

THE ROLE OF TURBULENCE TRANSPORT IN MECHANICAL ENERGY BUDGETS