Human pluripotent stem cells hold potential for regenerative medicine, but available cell types have significant limitations. Although embryonic stem cells (ES cells) from in vitro fertilized embryos (IVF ES cells) represent the ‘gold standard’, they are allogeneic to patients. Autologous induced pluripotent stem cells (iPS cells) are prone to epigenetic and transcriptional aberrations. To determine whether such abnormalities are intrinsic to somatic cell reprogramming or secondary to the reprogramming method, genetically matched sets of human IVF ES cells, iPS cells and nuclear transfer ES cells (NT ES cells) derived by somatic cell nuclear transfer (SCNT) were subjected to genome-wide analyses. Both NT ES cells and iPS cells derived from the same somatic cells contained comparable numbers of de novo copy number variations. In contrast, DNA methylation and transcriptome profiles of NT ES cells corresponded closely to those of IVF ES cells, whereas iPS cells differed and retained residual DNA methylation patterns typical of parental somatic cells. Thus, human somatic cells can be faithfully reprogrammed to pluripotency by SCNT and are therefore ideal for cell replacement therapies. Genome-wide analysis of matched human IVF embryonic stem cells (IVF ES cells), induced pluripotent stem cells (iPS cells) and nuclear transfer ES cells (NT ES cells) derived by somatic cell nuclear transfer (SCNT) reveals that human somatic cells can be faithfully reprogrammed to pluripotency by SCNT; NT ES cells and iPS cells derived from the same somatic cells contain comparable numbers of de novo copy number variations, but whereas DNA methylation and transcriptome profiles of NT ES cells and IVF ES cells are similar, iPS cells have residual patterns typical of parental somatic cells. This study compares the distinct genetic, epigenetic and transcriptional signatures of human pluripotent stem cells produced by somatic cell nuclear transfer (SCNT) with induced pluripotent stem (iPS) cells produced by transcription-factor-mediated reprogramming. Both cell types were produced from the same pool of somatic donor cells to ensure a genetic match. iPS cells and SCNT-derived embryonic stem cells contained comparable de novo copy number variations. The abnormalities previously reported — residual DNA methylation patterns typical of parental somatic cells — were observed as anticipated in the iPS cells, but not in the SCNT-derived cells. This suggests that human somatic cells can be faithfully reprogrammed to pluripotency by SCNT and therefore might be more appropriate than iPS cells for use in cell replacement therapies.