Uterus transplantation (UTx) is a treatment option for women with absolute uterine factor infertility. More than 100 UTx procedures have been performed, and the procedure is being accepted into clinical practice.1-3 However, rejection, which is typically asymptomatic, occurs in approximately 60% of patients4; specific biomarkers for uterine function and rejection are lacking.5 Current practice for assessing UTx graft rejection involves assessing cervical biopsies for T-lymphocyte infiltration between the stroma and epithelium and appraising perivascular inflammation, focal capillary disruption, and interstitial hemorrhage.4 Here, we describe a prospective kinetic multiparameter evaluation of a UTx patient to document insight into the immune mechanisms involved and the biomarkers associated with rejection. CASE DESCRIPTION Our 34-y-old patient had Mayer-Rokitansky-Küster-Hauser syndrome. She was transplanted with her mother's uterus under immunosuppressive treatments (basilixumab and intravenous corticosteroids for induction, followed by tacrolimus, mycophenolate mofetil, and oral corticosteroids6). Immunological profiles in her cervical biopsies and serum and vaginal microbiome analyses were compared with samples from 6 childbearing, nonpregnant, and not transplanted women with no comorbidities who underwent surgery for benign uterine polyps removed during the follicular phase of the menstrual cycle. Sample collections were consistent with the MARNI study protocol and the principles of the Declaration of Helsinki, as well as French law; the study was approved by the Institutional Review Board of Sud-Ouest et Outre-Mer in August 2020 (institutional review board number ID-RCB No: 2020-A00737-32) and registered as a clinical trial (No. NCT04615221). Informed consent was obtained from all study participants. Figure 1A summarizes our patient's clinical course. Her first menstrual cycle occurred 14 d after transplantation, and her first embryo transfer at 15 mo posttransplant resulted in a healthy pregnancy until 32 wk of gestation when preeclampsia with kidney failure necessitated a cesarean section; a healthy girl weighing 1850 g was delivered. Seventeen months after this delivery, she achieved a second pregnancy after a second embryo transfer, which progressed until 34 wk of gestation when persistent contractions occurred, necessitating a cesarean section; a healthy girl (2550 g) was delivered. The patient underwent uterus explantation 4 mo later, at 50 mo after UTx.FIGURE 1.: A, Clinical course of the UTx patient (PE and kidney failure; DSA+). B, Comparison of cervical biopsies from randomly selected healthy, nonpregnant controls and the UTx patient at 30 mo post-UTx and at UTx explantation, and a uterine fundus biopsy of the graft at explantation. Arrows shows C4d staining in vessels. Asma, alpha smooth muscle actin; CD4, T4 lymphocyte; CD8, T8 lymphocyte; CD20, B lymphocyte; CD68, macrophage; DSA, donor-specific antibody; PE, preeclampsia; UTx, uterus transplantation.Cervical biopsies (n = 29) performed weekly, monthly, and then quarterly post-UTx showed no signs of rejection according to Mölne's classification.4 They were comparable with those of controls (Figure 1B). Two borderline lesions were observed at day 15 and month 8 (untreated). Nevertheless, at uterus explantation (month 50), c4d was positive on endothelium vessels of both cervical and uterine samples. All our recipient cervical biopsies were negative for c4d staining (Figure S1, SDC,https://links.lww.com/TXD/A715). Serum donor-specific antibodies (DSAs) were positive for the first time at month 52 (DR1: 1200 median fluorescence intensity [MFI]; DQ5: 1800 MFI), and again at months 55 and 58 (A11b, DQ5, and DR1; >20 000 MFI). Imaging mass cytometry of cervical biopsies (Tables S1 and S2, SDC,https://links.lww.com/TXD/A715) revealed immune condensation foci, including CD8, CD4, CD20, and macrophages of the explanted uterus at month 50, which were not present before hysterectomy or in controls (Figure 1B). A significant increase in CD27+CD38+ plasmablasts was observed starting from 49 mo post-UTx. However, the incidence of B lymphocytes was within the range of control values although it decreased from around 35 mo post-UTx (Figure 2A).FIGURE 2.: Kinetics of blood biological markers and the vaginal microbiome in the UTx patient vs healthy controls (n = 6). A, Frequency of CD27+ and CD38+ and B cells. B, Non–multidimensional scaling. C, Abundance of the top genes in the vaginal microbiome. Incidence of inflammatory cytokines and CRP (D), HLA-DR and NKG2C (E), CD107a among CD3−CD56+ NK cells with K567 (F), and CRP (G). Red arrow indicates delivery. CRP, C-reactive protein; IL, interleukin; NK, natural killer; TNF-α, tumor necrosis factor-α; UTx, uterus transplantation.Longitudinal analyses with a beta-diversity approach using Bray-Curtis distance couplet with an 5mining Massive Data Sets algorithm and the PERMANOVA test revealed a statistically significant separation between the vaginal microbiome of our patient and the controls (P = 0.002; Figure 2B). The microbiomes of our patient at month 21 post-UTx and the controls were dominated by Lactobacillus, whereas microbiome of our patient was also composed of Bifidobacterium (Figure 2C), which became largely dysbiotic after delivery at month 23. The predominance of Escherichia/Shigella at months 23 and 36 post-UTx was correlated with clinical signs of vaginal infections (5 successfully treated during the graft life; Figure 1A). Due to the complex interplay among microbiota, vaginal infection, and inflammation,7 we investigated sera concentrations of interleukin (IL)-6, IL-8, tumor necrosis factor-α, C-reactive protein (CRP), IL-4, and IL-10 cytokines. Compared with controls, a peak of IL-6 and IL-8 occurred in our patient at month 23 after her delivery, which was more marked at month 48 (Figure 2D), corresponding to the last vaginal infection just before hysterectomy. In contrast to the level of CRP, which peaked at month 23 and again at months 35, 43, and 46, tumor necrosis factor-α exhibited a more fluctuating, albeit declining, trend throughout her treatment course (Figure 2D). Levels of IL-4 and IL-10 remained close to baseline (data not shown). Her cytomegalovirus status was positive (IgG+ and IgM–) and no reinfection was observed during the graft life. Analysis of the immune microenvironment in blood by flow cytometry (Table S3, SDC,https://links.lww.com/TXD/A715) revealed profound alterations in the CD3−CD56+ natural killer (NK) cell compartment compared with controls (Figure 2E). Progressive and significant increases in the cell-activation HLA-DR and activating NKG2C occurred until 48 mo post-UTx (Figure 2E). These trends indicate the presence of adaptive "NK-like" cells that are physiologically endowed with potent anti-infectious functions.8 Thus, CD107a expression revealed a higher degranulation capacity of these cells than controls and increased similarly to NKG2C expression, whether with or without stimulation by coculturing with K562 target cells (Figure 2F). Consistent with these observations, increased expression at month 49 of granzyme B, a key marker of degranulation and a noninvasive biomarker of rejection in solid transplantation,9 was detected by quantitative Polymerase Chain Reaction in cervical biopsies, vaginal smears, and peripheral blood until hysterectomy (Figure 2G). DISCUSSION The positivity of c4d on the graft vessels during explantation may indicate a potential humoral rejection. The persistent presence of functional activating adaptive "NK-like" cells in our patient, with pathologic levels of several inflammatory markers and cytokines, such as IL-6, IL-8, and CRP associated with repeated infections, suggest silent or chronic viral and bacterial infections. These findings need confirmation in a cohort of UTx patients. Humoral rejection is a feared complication in organ transplantation. Antibodies bind to graft vascular endothelial cells, activating the complement system leading to tissue necrosis.10 Acute antibody-mediated rejection (AMR) is well defined in kidney transplantation with established histologic criteria, which include c4d and non-c4d criteria, associating with DSAs.5 No consensus about the diagnosis of AMR is available in UTx. In the current report, c4d positivity was observed during explantation and a weak DSA positivity 2 mo after explantation. Together, these observations raise the possibility of a beginning of humoral rejection at the time of uterus explantation. Nevertheless, the possibility also exists that the DSA positivity after explantation was due to cessation of immunosuppression, and c4d staining alone is not specific enough and may reflect other processes like infection. Only a few cases of AMR have been reported in UTx.11,12 Inflammatory responses in 2 cases in the first UTx series may reflect chronic rejection as in the composite vascularized tissue graft model.13 No signs of clear chronic rejection were observed in our case, although the appearance of immune condensation foci showed some inflammation14 The 2 pregnancies in our UTx recipient may have favored rejection due to sensitization associated with the semiallogenic fetus.15 Recent studies showed that innate immunity and particularly NK cells play a role in chronic and humoral rejection with the concept of "missing self."16 Priming of NK-cell rejection could be favored by infections.17 This complex interplay between infection and immune response described in our case should encourage active vaginal infection treatment in UTx to avoid rejection. Our functional activating adaptive "NK-like" cells show an appropriate response to infection. Their progressive increase could indicate subclinical persistent infections due to immunosuppression. More markers (like CD457 and KIR) are needed to confirm that the identified NK cells were really adaptive. The microbiome appears to be altered in organ transplantation and involved in rejection.18 In our case, a vaginal microbiome alteration may have been responsible for repetitive infections in direct relation to the graft. Therefore, the influence of the vaginal microbiome should also be explored in future UTx studies.19 We identified granzyme B as a potential biomarker of rejection as it progressively increased, particularly at the end of the graft life, and is well known in solid organ transplantation.20 The limitation of this marker could be its specificity: the peak observed during the first pregnancy was attributed to preeclampsia.21 Although this is the first study investigating immunological and infection trends post-UTx, the findings must be interpreted in the context of potential limitations. The data were derived from only 1 UTx patient who experienced several infections as well as the potential beginning of humoral rejection, preeclampsia, and kidney failure (albeit conditions that affect up to 16% of UTx patients). Some bias may have been introduced by biopsies taken in both the luteal and follicular phases of the menstrual cycle in our recipient, while they were taken exclusively in the follicular phase of the controls. Moreover, bias may have been introduced by the controls being neither transplanted nor pregnant. Complete analyses of the materno-fetal interface and immunological profile in UTx recipients are required to help develop noninvasive approaches to identify UTx rejection, prevent other complications associated with these pregnancies, and evaluate the impact on the offspring. ACKNOWLEDGMENTS The authors thank the patients for the collection of their samples, the Department of Clinic Research, Foch Hospital, especially F. Couppey, for administrative supervision, and the Foch pathology team for analysis of the biopsies.
