Background and Aims The aim of this study was to investigate the imaging performance and quality differences of PCD-CT in standard resolution mode (SR) versus ultra-high resolution mode (UHR) in the lower extremity runoff of dose-matched CTAs in a human cadaveric model. Methods Extracorporeal perfusion of the upper leg was established in one fresh-frozen human cadaver via inguinal and popliteal accesses using a peristaltic pump. Seven peripheral stents were deployed in the SFA. Photon-counting CTAs were performed under contrast perfusion in SR and UHR mode with dose-equivalent 120 kVp acquisition protocols (low-/ medium-/ high-dose: CTDIVol = 3, 5, 10 mGy) and reconstructed with four vascular convolution kernels. Lumen visibility and contrast-to-noise ratio were compared using analyses of variance. Subjective image quality was assessed using a pairwise, forced-choice comparison software. Results Lumen visibility was equal for SR and UHR at the used dose levels. CNR increase by UHR was significant for (ultra-)sharp convolution kernels BV60 (3 mGy; UHR vs. SR, 19.9 ± 1.9 vs. 15.7 ± 1.6, p < 0.046) and BV76 (8.0 ± 0.6 vs. 5.4 ± 0.3, p < 0.001). The relative CNR increase was higher for low-dose than high-dose scans (BV76: 48% vs. 36% at high dose, p < 0.033). The CNR of the low-dose scan in UHR mode was comparable to the high-dose scan in SR mode when the ultra-sharp kernel was used (8.0 ± 0.6 vs. 9.1 ± 1.1, p > 0.760). Among UHR examinations, a significant increase in CNR could only be measured in BV76 (8.0 ± 0.6 (3 mGy) vs. 12.4 ± 0.9 (10 mGy), p < 0.001). Readers preferred subjective image quality of UHR for all kernels with BV76 being ranked highest. Conclusion The CNR increase in UHR mode is highest when combining low radiation dose and ultra-sharp reconstructions. Meanwhile, the subjective image quality in UHR mode generally supersedes SR images, suggesting further dose reduction potential. The aim of this study was to investigate the imaging performance and quality differences of PCD-CT in standard resolution mode (SR) versus ultra-high resolution mode (UHR) in the lower extremity runoff of dose-matched CTAs in a human cadaveric model. Extracorporeal perfusion of the upper leg was established in one fresh-frozen human cadaver via inguinal and popliteal accesses using a peristaltic pump. Seven peripheral stents were deployed in the SFA. Photon-counting CTAs were performed under contrast perfusion in SR and UHR mode with dose-equivalent 120 kVp acquisition protocols (low-/ medium-/ high-dose: CTDIVol = 3, 5, 10 mGy) and reconstructed with four vascular convolution kernels. Lumen visibility and contrast-to-noise ratio were compared using analyses of variance. Subjective image quality was assessed using a pairwise, forced-choice comparison software. Lumen visibility was equal for SR and UHR at the used dose levels. CNR increase by UHR was significant for (ultra-)sharp convolution kernels BV60 (3 mGy; UHR vs. SR, 19.9 ± 1.9 vs. 15.7 ± 1.6, p < 0.046) and BV76 (8.0 ± 0.6 vs. 5.4 ± 0.3, p < 0.001). The relative CNR increase was higher for low-dose than high-dose scans (BV76: 48% vs. 36% at high dose, p < 0.033). The CNR of the low-dose scan in UHR mode was comparable to the high-dose scan in SR mode when the ultra-sharp kernel was used (8.0 ± 0.6 vs. 9.1 ± 1.1, p > 0.760). Among UHR examinations, a significant increase in CNR could only be measured in BV76 (8.0 ± 0.6 (3 mGy) vs. 12.4 ± 0.9 (10 mGy), p < 0.001). Readers preferred subjective image quality of UHR for all kernels with BV76 being ranked highest. The CNR increase in UHR mode is highest when combining low radiation dose and ultra-sharp reconstructions. Meanwhile, the subjective image quality in UHR mode generally supersedes SR images, suggesting further dose reduction potential.