Abstract. IASI-A, IASI-B and IASI-C (Infrared Atmospheric Sounding Interferometer) are nadir-looking thermal-infrared sensors which have monitored the atmospheric composition since 2008. Atmospheric carbon monoxide (CO) is retrieved from IASI radiances with two algorithms: the SOftware for a Fast Retrieval of IASI Data (SOFRID) and Fast Optimal Retrievals on Layers for IASI (FORLI). Airborne in situ observations from the In-service Aircraft for a Global Observing System (IAGOS) European research infrastructure have been used to validate IASI CO retrievals. The validation study of IASI CO data performed in 2011 with IAGOS data was limited to two airports (Frankfurt and Windhoek) and 2 years because of the limited sampling at the other IAGOS sites. The extension of the IAGOS infrastructure during the last decade has enabled validation with enough temporal sampling at 33 airports worldwide over the whole IASI-A period (2008–2019). The retrievals provide between 1.5 and 3 independent pieces of information about the CO vertical profile, and we have chosen to validate the surface–600 hPa and 600–200 hPa partial columns in addition to the total column. The ability of the retrievals to capture the CO variabilities is slightly different for the two retrieval algorithms. The correlation coefficients for the time series are generally larger for SOFRID, especially for the total and lower-tropospheric columns, meaning a better representation of the phase of the variability, while the amplitudes of the variations of FORLI are in better agreement with IAGOS in the middle to upper troposphere. On average, SOFRID and FORLI retrievals underestimate the IAGOS total column of CO (TCC) by 8 ± 16 % and 6 ± 14 %, respectively. This global TCC agreement between the algorithms hides significant vertical and geographical differences. In the lower troposphere (surface–600 hPa), the bias is larger for FORLI (−11 ± 27 %) than for SOFRID (−4 ± 24 %). In the middle to upper troposphere, the situation is reversed, with biases of −6 ± 15 % for FORLI and −11 ± 13 % for SOFRID. The largest differences between the retrievals are detected south of 13.5° S (latitude of Bangkok), where SOFRID underestimation is systematically larger for the TCC and the mid- to upper-tropospheric column. North of 40° N (latitude of Philadelphia), FORLI biases are significantly larger than SOFRID ones for the TCC and the lower-tropospheric columns. Our validation results provide users with an overview of the quality of IASI CO retrievals and developers with insights into improving the retrievals in the future.