Abstract A population under selection to improve one trait may evolve a sub-optimal state for another trait due to tradeoffs and other evolutionary constraints. How this evolution affects the capacity of a population to adapt when conditions change to favor the second trait is an open question. We investigated this question using isolates from a lineage spanning 60,000 generations of the Long-Term Evolution Experiment (LTEE) with Escherichia coli , where cells have access to a shared pool of resources, and have evolved increased competitive ability and a concomitant reduction in numerical yield. Using media-in oil emulsions we shifted the focus of selection to numerical yield, where cells grew in isolated patches with private resources. We found that the time spent evolving under shared resources did not affect the ability to re-evolve toward higher numerical yield. The evolution of numerical yield commonly occurred through mutations in the phosphoenolpyruvate phosphotransferase system. These mutants exhibit slower uptake of glucose, making them poorer competitors for public resources, and produce smaller cells that release less carbon as overflow metabolites. Our results demonstrate that mutations that were not part of adaptation under one selective regime may enable access to ancestral phenotypes when selection changes to favor evolutionary reversion.

Evolution with private resources reverses some changes from long-term evolution with public resources