MP25-11 PREDICTORS OF SURGICAL SUCCESS FOR ROBOTIC URETERAL RECONSTRUCTION OF PROXIMAL AND MIDDLE URETERAL STRICTURES

Abstract

You have accessJournal of UrologyCME1 May 2022MP25-11 PREDICTORS OF SURGICAL SUCCESS FOR ROBOTIC URETERAL RECONSTRUCTION OF PROXIMAL AND MIDDLE URETERAL STRICTURES Matthew Lee, Ziho Lee, Randall Lee, David Strauss, Rohit Reddy, Lee C. Zhao, Michael D. Stifelman, and Daniel Eun Matthew LeeMatthew Lee More articles by this author , Ziho LeeZiho Lee More articles by this author , Randall LeeRandall Lee More articles by this author , David StraussDavid Strauss More articles by this author , Rohit ReddyRohit Reddy More articles by this author , Lee C. ZhaoLee C. Zhao More articles by this author , Michael D. StifelmanMichael D. Stifelman More articles by this author , and Daniel EunDaniel Eun More articles by this author View All Author Informationhttps://doi.org/10.1097/JU.0000000000002568.11AboutPDF ToolsAdd to favoritesDownload CitationsTrack CitationsPermissionsReprints ShareFacebookLinked InTwitterEmail Abstract INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVE: We investigate predictors of surgical success for patients undergoing robotic ureteral reconstruction (RUR) for proximal and middle ureteral stricture disease. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed our multi-institutional Collaborative of Reconstructive Robotic Ureteral Surgery (CORRUS) database to identify all consecutive patients undergoing RUR for proximal and/or middle ureteral stricture disease between 04/2012-01/2019. The specific reconstruction technique was determined by the primary surgeon based on clinical history and intraoperative findings. Patients were grouped according to whether or not they were surgical successful. Preoperative variables between both groups were compared using chi-square tests. All independent variables with associations of p<0.2 then underwent a binary logistic regression analysis to determine predictive variables of success for RUR (p≤0.05 was considered statistically significant). RESULTS: Overall, 228 patients met inclusion criteria. Univariate analysis (Table 1) showed that there were a lower proportion of patients with diabetes (8.5% versus 29.6%, p<0.01) and a higher proportion of patients who underwent ureteral rest (84.5% versus 63.0%, p=0.01) in the surgical success group. Multivariate logistic regression analysis (Table 2) further revealed that patients with diabetes were 3.74 times more at risk (p=0.01, CI: 1.35-10.37) of failing to achieve surgical success compared to those without diabetes. Patients undergoing ureteral rest prior to RUR were 2.68 times more likely (p=0.04, CI: 1.05-6.82) to achieve surgical success compared to those who did not undergo ureteral rest. CONCLUSIONS: In patients undergoing RUR for management of proximal and middle ureteral strictures, preoperative factors such as the absence of diabetes and the implementation of ureteral rest may optimize surgical outcomes. Source of Funding: None © 2022 by American Urological Association Education and Research, Inc.FiguresReferencesRelatedDetails Volume 207Issue Supplement 5May 2022Page: e432 Advertisement Copyright & Permissions© 2022 by American Urological Association Education and Research, Inc.MetricsAuthor Information Matthew Lee More articles by this author Ziho Lee More articles by this author Randall Lee More articles by this author David Strauss More articles by this author Rohit Reddy More articles by this author Lee C. Zhao More articles by this author Michael D. Stifelman More articles by this author Daniel Eun More articles by this author Expand All Advertisement PDF downloadLoading ...