Matrix Thermalization Ben Crapsa, Oleg Evninb,a, K´evin Nguyena aTheoretische Natuurkunde, Vrije Universiteit Brussel (VUB), and International Solvay Institutes, Pleinlaan 2, B-1050 Brussels, Belgium bDepartment of Physics, Faculty of Science, Chulalongkorn University, Thanon Phayathai, Pathumwan, Bangkok 10330, Thailand Ben.Craps@vub.ac.be, oleg.evnin@gmail.com, Kevin.Huy.D.Nguyen@vub.ac.be ABSTRACT Matrix quantum mechanics offers an attractive environment for discussing gravitational holography, in which both sides of the holographic duality are well-defined.Similarly to higher-dimensional implementations of holography, collapsing shell solutions in the gravi- tational bulk correspond in this setting to thermalization processes in the dual quantum mechanical theory. We construct an explicit, fully nonlinear supergravity solution describ- ing a generic collapsing dilaton shell, specify the holographic renormalization prescriptions necessary for computing the relevant boundary observables, and apply them to evaluating thermalizing two-point correlation functions in the dual matrix theory. arXiv:1610.05333v3 [hep-th] 13 Feb 2017
Contents 1Introduction1 2Review of IIA Supergravity - Matrix Theory Duality5 3Dimensional Reduction of IIA Supergravity8 4Holographic Renormalization10 5Retarded Boundary-to-Bulk Propagators13 6Linear Response in Matrix Theory17 ADetails of the Dimensional Reduction19 BDerivation of General Background Solution21 CBulk Field Asymptotics23 DOn-Shell Evaluation of the Action26 EOne-point Functions27 FBoundary-to-Bulk Propagators in VacuumAdS228 G Lowest Quasinormal Modes30 G.1Universality of Frequency-to-Temperature Ratio . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .30 G.2Frobenius Expansion Near the Horizon. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .31 G.3Numerical Shooting Method. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .33 1Introduction In recent years, gauge/gravity duality, also known as “holography,” has emerged as a rare tool for the study of strongly coupled systems far from equilibrium. Originally motivated by the creation of a quark gluon plasma in ultrarelativistic heavy ion collisions, many authors have used the AdS/CFT correspondence to study what happens when energy is suddenly injected in a strongly coupled quantum field theory. Interesting results include thermaliza- tion times short enough to be compatible with experiments [1–10], a thermalization pattern in which short-wavelength modes thermalize first [7, 11], and new insights in the spreading of entanglement entropy after a 1+1d quantum quench [5, 7, 12–14]. It is interesting to ask whether holography can be used to make predictions for the ther- malization of systems that can also be studied using conventional techniques.If so, this would provide a framework in which holography can be quantitatively tested in a far-from- equilibrium regime. With this question in mind, we will study holographic thermalization 1
in BFSS matrix theory [15, 16], a quantum-mechanical model ofN×Nmatrices which, in theN→ ∞limit, has been proposed as a nonperturbative definition of M-theory in asymptotically flat backgrounds [16]. Our considerations will revolve around the relation of this model [17] to a non-conformal version of the AdS/CFT correspondence [18–21]. It has also appeared in recent discussions of “fast scrambling” [22], the fast spreading of in- formation that is added “locally” (e.g., in one matrix component). While our focus will be on far-from-equilibrium processes driven by energy injection, a simpler holographic setup involving the same matrix theory has been previously studied, in a way involving extensive numerical simulations, in a sequence of papers including [23–28]. In those considerations, a stationary black hole was introduced in the gravitational bulk, corresponding to thermody- namic equilibrium, rather than thermalization, in the dual matrix theory. Further analytic considerations of matrix theory thermodynamics can be found in [29, 30]. In [31, 32], dy- namics of moduli fields has been explored as a tool to probe thermal properties of higher- dimensional super-Yang-Mills theories, though applications to the case of matrix theory are less straightforward. Despite the apparent simplicity of the BFSS matrix theory, which involves quantum mechanics rather than quantum field theory, real-time evolution of this model in the ap- propriate strong coupling regime presently appears to be out of reach of conventional tech- niques, even for small values ofN. The nine scalar matrices and their fermionic partners contain too many degrees of freedom to allow direct diagonalization, and the interactions between the various matrix elements appear to be too nonlocal for variational techniques such as tensor network methods to be directly applicable. It would be really nice if these or other techniques could be developed up to the point where they can capture matrix theory, first for smallNand later for larger values ofN, in order to allow detailed comparison with holography. (We would like to mention an intriguing attempt to tackle the quantum dynamics of a simpler bosonic matrix theory undertaken in [33].)In the meantime, nu- merical simulations have been carried out in another regime, where the matrix theory can be treated classically [34–36]. (A similar study of the related BMN matrix model can be found in [37].) This is a simplification which would not arise in higher dimensions; see [36] and references therein. One motivation is that, according to numerical simulations, there is no phase transition between the different regimes [23–28], so some qualitative features can be expected to be similar [36]. Further studies of semiclassical processes in the matrix theory revolving around the idea of continuity from weak to strong coupling can be found in [38, 39]. In this paper, we use D0-brane holography [18–21] to study far-from-equilibrium evolu- tion of matrix theory after a sudden injection of energy. In higher-dimensional AdS/CFT, a simple way to inject energy in a holographic field theory is by briefly turning on and off a homogeneous source, for instance for an anisotropic component of the stress tensor [3], for an electric current [40] or for a scalar operator [41]. In the bulk, this corresponds to turning on nontrivial boundary conditions for the corresponding bulk field. For a small-amplitude scalar perturbation, an approximate AdS-Vaidya spacetime was found [41], and this has become an often-used toy model for homogeneous, isotropic energy injection. Interestingly, the electric field perturbation of [40] yields an exact AdS-Vaidya spacetime. 2
For D0-brane holography, if one restricts to an ansatz that is spherically symmetric in the “internal” directions (transverse to the D0-brane worldvolume), the supergravity field equations simplify to those of a dilaton-gravity model [20, 21] coupled to an additional scalar (the “breathing mode” of the internal sphere) [20].We will explicitly solve the dilaton-gravity equations (with the breathing mode set to zero) with an arbitrary boundary profile for the dilaton (corresponding to an arbitrary source for the dual operator). As a consequence of the lack of dynamical degrees of freedom in 2d dilaton-gravity, if one turns a source on and off, the late-time bulk metric agrees with the early-time bulk metric, and no net energy was injected. We will find, however, that one can inject energy in the system by considering a boundary condition for the dilaton that is constant at early times and evolves to a different constant value at late times.In field theory language, this corresponds to starting with a thermal state and ending with a thermal state at a different temperature (and with a different value of the coupling constant). Concretely, in Appendix B we derive the following exact analytic solution of IIA su- pergravity, expressed in adual framein which the 2d metric is asymptotically AdS (see Section 2, where more details will be provided): ds2 dual=−1 x2 [ 2dvdx+ ( 1 + 20 21 ˙φ(0)(v)x−M0e4 3φ(0)(v)x14/5 ) dv2 ] + 25 4dΩ2 8,(1) φ(v, x) =φ(0)(v) + 21 10 logx,(2) whereM0is a mass parameter andφ(0)(v) is a function that one is free to choose as Dirichlet boundary condition for the dilaton fieldφand which we also call dilatonsource. The metric (1) describes a black hole with massM=M0e4 3φ(0) and is asymptoticallyAdS2×S8for x→0, where the timelike boundary ofAdS2is located. Provided that we haveM06= 0, a non-constant dilaton boundary valueφ(0)(v) will effectively result in a non-constant mass term in the metric. Even though the above collapsing solution allows arbitrary energy injection patterns, in this paper, we will mostly consider the thin-shell limit in which a black hole spacetime of some initial temperature is glued to a black hole spacetime of higher temperature at a null surfacev=v0. This can be achieved by assuming the following profile for the dilaton source: v < v0:φ(0)(v) =φ0,(3) v > v0:φ(0)(v) = 0,(4) withφ0a negative constant.For computational simplicity, we will often consider the φ0→ −∞limit in which the initial temperature vanishes and the early-time geometry is vacuumAdS2: v < v0: { φ(0)(v)→ −∞, ˙φ(0)(v) = 0,(5) 3
v > v0:φ(0)(v) = 0.(6) At least within an energy range to be discussed in the next section, this solution is holographically dual to matrix theory excited (“quenched”) away from equilibrium through energy injection.However, the solution (1)-(2) does not describe propagating degrees of freedom and will not be sufficient for computing non-trivial correlation functions.As a dynamical probe of this background, we then consider fluctuations in the size of the compact S8, i.e., the breathing mode. This mode has already been considered in previous holographic works [19,20] and has been identified in [19] to be dual to a matrix theory operatorT−−, to be defined in (35), by matching ofgeneralized conformal scaling dimensions[42–44]. Our setup will allow us to holographically compute its retarded two-point correlation function in the quenched dual state, thereby providing a first non-trivial observable which, in the future, one may hope to compare with direct matrix theory computations.Predictably, the late-time behavior of this correlation function is dominated by the lowest quasinormal mode of the final state black hole. AdS2holography has a reputation for being very subtle and relatively poorly understood (see [45–52] for a sampling of the literature, with an emphasis on recent discussions), so one might wonder why we did not run into problems when consideringAdS2backgrounds and excitations thereof.To see the difference between our D0-brane holography and what is usually referred to asAdS2holography, note that ourAdS2solution arises in the dual frame, in which the effective dilaton-gravity action takes the form (43) with constantb= 25/4. This action has a nontrivial dilaton kinetic term, the removal of which would require a dilaton-dependent rescaling of the metric. After such a rescaling, the metric would no longer be asymptoticallyAdS2.This should be contrasted with conventionalAdS2holography, which considers asymptoticallyAdS2solutions in the frame without a dilaton kinetic term, which turns out to be more subtle. More specifically, subtleties such as the absence of finite- energy excitations for fixed asymptotics arise forAdS2solutions with constant dilaton.1In the theory we are considering here, the dilaton field depends at least on the radial coordinate for all solutions of the equations of motion, and holography works in a way similar to the running dilaton solutions considered in [52]. The paper is organized as follows. In Section 2 we review the duality between matrix theory and IIA supergravity originally conjectured in [18], setting thereby the conventions that are going to be used throughout this work. In Section 3, we study the bosonic part of type IIA supergravity with asymptoticallyAdS2×S8geometry in the dual frame.In order to simplify the problem as much as possible, we only consider spherically symmetric solutions, leading to a two-dimensional effective theory describing the metric, the dilaton and the breathing mode accounting for theS8size dynamics. This mode is the only prop- agating physical degree of freedom in that system, and will be our probe for computing non-trivial correlations functions in the quenched dual state. It is important to note that the breathing mode cannot be considered nonperturbatively as noted in [20], because it deforms the boundary away fromAdS2(see Appendix C). In terms of matrix theory, its 1We thank Ioannis Papadimitriou for a useful discussion on this point. 4
dual operatorT−−is irrelevant and cannot be sourced nonperturbatively. Nonetheless, a proper perturbative treatment of the breathing mode is expected to correctly reproduce the correlation functions of the dual matrix theory operator [20,53]. In Section 4 we perform the holographic renormalization procedure [54]. Knowing the fields’ asymptotics near theAdS2 boundary as well as the on-shell effective action, local boundary counterterms are added in order to cancel boundary divergences.This is part of the precise holographic descrip- tion of matrix theory.In earlier works holographic renormalization has been performed for various cases, including non-linear gravity-dilaton solutions [21] and breathing mode perturbations around pureAdS2×S8[20]. Related work also includes [55]. A general dis- cussion of holographic renormalization in the presence of irrelevant operators deforming the AdS boundary can be found in [53]. Here we consider breathing mode perturbations around non-linear gravity-dilaton background solutions, allowing in particular for time-dependent backgrounds of the form (1)-(2). In Section 5 we compute the retarded boundary-to-bulk propagator of the breathing mode in the case of pureAdS2and in the more interesting case of the thin-shell solution (1)-(6), which is dual to a quenched state in matrix theory. For the retarded propagator in the latter case, we use numerical evolution and show that its asymptotic value near the boundary is rapidly dominated by a single decaying and oscillating mode after crossing of the shell located atv=v0.We also show that the associated single complex frequency dominating the retarded two-point function in this quenched state with final temperature Tcoincides with the lowest quasinormal mode frequency of breathing mode fluctuations around a static black hole at the same temperatureT. The first and second quasinormal mode frequencies are therefore computed in Appendix G using a numerical shooting method. Using these results, we holographically derive in Section 6 the retarded non-equal-time two-point function ofT−−.Earlier computations of holographic two-point functions in equilibrium states (as opposed to our far-from-equilibrium setting) can be found in [19, 56, 57]. 2Review of IIA Supergravity - Matrix Theory Duality We start by reviewing the duality originally presented in [18], looking only at terms relevant for the present work and setting our conventions. Useful references include [19,58,59]. The bosonic part of the 10d type IIA supergravity action in string frame is Sstring=1 (2π)7g2 sα′4 ∫ d10x√−g [ e−2φ(R+ 4(∂φ)2)−1 4F2 ] ,(7) withgsand√α′=lsbeing the string coupling and the string length, respectively.This action involves the metric, a scalar dilatonφand a gauge potentialCMwith field strength FM N=∂MCN−∂NCMand densityF2≡FM NFM N.This system admits a solution representingNcoincident electric D-particles at the origin [60]: ds2 string=−H−1/2dt2+H1/2dxidxi,(8) 5
eφ=H3/4,(9) C0=H−1−1,(10) whereHis a single-centered harmonic function on the Euclidean space labeled by Cartesian coordinatesxi, given by H= 1 +Q r7,r2≡ 9∑ i=1 x2 i,Q= 60π3gsN(α′)7/2.(11) It has been conjectured that the near-horizon limit or decoupling limit of the above D-particle background is dual to matrix theory [18]. Explicitly, this decoupling limit is gs→0,α′→0,U≡r α′= fixed,g2 Y MN= fixed,(12) where the energy is kept fixed while taking the limit, and the Yang-Mills coupling of matrix theory is identified with g2 Y M= 4π2gs(α′)−3/2.(13) Performing a Weyl transformation on the string frame metric (8) while definingβ0≡ 4 25(15π)2/7, one can go to the so-calleddual frame[58] ds2 dual≡β−1 0α′−10/7(g2 Y MN eφ)−2/7ds2 string(14) = 25 4 [ −U5 15πg2 Y MN dt2+U−2dU2+dΩ2 8 ] ,(15) in which the action reads Sdual=β4 0(g2 Y MN)8/7 (2π)3(α′)9/7g4 Y M ∫ d10x√−g [ e−6 7φ(R+ 16 49(∂φ)2)−e6 7φ 4β0(α′)10/7(g2 Y MN)2/7F2 ] . (16) For further simplification, we apply the following fields redefinitions, e˜φ≡β−1 1(α′)3/2(g2 Y MN)3/10eφ,(17) ˜C0≡β−1/2 0β6 7 1(α′)−2(g2 Y MN)−2/5C0,(18) where we defineβ1≡5×54/5 4×21/10(3π)3/10, bringing the action to the form Sdual=β4 0β−6 7 1(g2 Y MN)7/5 (2π)3g4 Y M ∫ d10x√−g [ e−6 7˜φ(R+ 16 49(∂˜φ)2)−1 4e6 7˜φ˜F2 ] .(19) Finally, by performing the coordinate redefinition z2= 12π 5g2 Y MN U−5,(20) 6
100%
Scan to connect with one of our mobile apps
Coinbase Wallet app
Connect with your self-custody wallet
Coinbase app
Connect with your Coinbase account
Open Coinbase Wallet app
Tap Scan
Or try the Coinbase Wallet browser extension
Connect with dapps with just one click on your desktop browser
Add an additional layer of security by using a supported Ledger hardware wallet