Paper
Document
Submit new version
Download
Flag content
0

Dark Energy Survey year 1 results: Cosmological constraints from galaxy clustering and weak lensing

Authors
T. Abbott,F. Abdalla
A. Alarcon,J. Aleksić,S. Allam,S. Allen,A. Amara,J. Annis,J. Asorey,S. Àvila,David Bacon,E. Balbinot,M. Banerji,Nilanjan Banik,Wayne Barkhouse,Michael Baumer,Eric Baxter,K. Bechtol,M. Becker,A. Benoit-Lévy,B. Benson,G. Bernstein,E. Bertin,Jonathan Blazek,Sarah Bridle,D. Brooks,Dillon Brout,E. Buckley‐Geer,D. Burke,H. Aussel,A. Campos,D. Capozzi,A. Rosell,M. Kind,J. Carretero,F. Castander,R. Cawthon,C. Chang,Nianyi Chen,M. Childress,A. Choi,Christopher Conselice,Robert Crittenden,L. Costa,C. D’Andrea,Ritanjan Das,T. Davis,C. Davis,J. Vicente,D. DePoy,Joseph DeRose,S. Desai,H. Diehl,Scott Dodelson,P. Doel,A. Drlica-Wagner,T. Eifler,S. Escoffier,F. Elsner,J. Elvin-Poole,A. Evrard,Yuedong Fang,E. Fernández,A. Ferté,D. Finley,B. Flaugher,P. Fosalba,I. Ferrero,J. García-Bellido,M Garcia-Fernandez,M. Gatti,E. Gaztañaga,D. Gerdes,T. Giannantonio,M. Gill,Karl Glazebrook,D. Goldstein,D. Gruen,R. Gruendl,J. Gschwend,G. Gutiérrez,S. Hamilton,A. Palmese,S. Hinton,K. Honscheid,B. Hoyle,Dragan Huterer,Bhuvnesh Jain,D. James,Mike Jarvis,T. Jeltema,M. Johnson,Margaret Johnson,Tomasz Kacprzak,S. Kent,A. Kim,A. King,Nickolas Kokron,András Kovács,E. Krause,C. Krawiec,Anthony Kremin,K. Kuehn,S. Kuhlmann,N. Kuropatkin,F. Lacasa,O. Lahav,T. Li,Andrew Liddle,C. Lidman,M. Lima,H. Lin,N. MacCrann,M. Maia,Marc Manera,M. March,J. Marshall,Paul Martini,R. McMahon,P. Melchior,F. Menanteau,R. Miquel,Vivian Miranda,D. Mudd,J. Muir,A. Möller,E. Neilsen,R. Nichol,B. Nord,P. Nugent,R. Ogando,J. Peacock,Hiranya Peiris,Will Percival,D. Petravick,A. Plazas,A. Porredon,J. Prat,Arnau Pujol,Markus Rau,Alexandre Réfrégier,P. Ricker,N. Roe,R. Rollins,A. Romer,A. Roodman,R. Rosenfeld,Ashley Ross,Eduardo Rozo,E. Rykoff,M. Šako,A. Salvador,S. Samuroff,C. Sánchez,E. Sánchez,S. Serrano,J. Schwiening,D. Scolnic,L. Secco,I. Sevilla-Noarbe,E. Sheldon,R. Smith,M. Smith,J. Smith,M. Soares-Santos,F. Sobreira,E. Suchyta,D. Thomas,M. Troxel,D. Tucker,B. Tucker,S. Uddin,J. Weller,P Vielzeuf,A. Vivas,A. Walker,M. Wang,Risa Wechsler,A. Wicklund,R. Wolf,B. Yanny,F. Yuan,A. Zenteno,B. Zhang,Y. Zhang,J. Zuntz,A. Alarcón,Jelena Aleksić,E. Baxter,J. Blazek
+188 authors
,Tamara Davis
Published
Aug 27, 2018
Show more
Save
TipTip
Document
Submit new version
Download
Flag content
0
TipTip
Save
Document
Submit new version
Download
Flag content

Abstract

We present cosmological results from a combined analysis of galaxy clustering and weak gravitational lensing, using 1321 deg$^2$ of $griz$ imaging data from the first year of the Dark Energy Survey (DES Y1). We combine three two-point functions: (i) the cosmic shear correlation function of 26 million source galaxies in four redshift bins, (ii) the galaxy angular autocorrelation function of 650,000 luminous red galaxies in five redshift bins, and (iii) the galaxy-shear cross-correlation of luminous red galaxy positions and source galaxy shears. To demonstrate the robustness of these results, we use independent pairs of galaxy shape, photometric redshift estimation and validation, and likelihood analysis pipelines. To prevent confirmation bias, the bulk of the analysis was carried out while blind to the true results; we describe an extensive suite of systematics checks performed and passed during this blinded phase. The data are modeled in flat $\Lambda$CDM and $w$CDM cosmologies, marginalizing over 20 nuisance parameters, varying 6 (for $\Lambda$CDM) or 7 (for $w$CDM) cosmological parameters including the neutrino mass density and including the 457 $\times$ 457 element analytic covariance matrix. We find consistent cosmological results from these three two-point functions, and from their combination obtain $S_8 \equiv \sigma_8 (\Omega_m/0.3)^{0.5} = 0.783^{+0.021}_{-0.025}$ and $\Omega_m = 0.264^{+0.032}_{-0.019}$ for $\Lambda$CDM for $w$CDM, we find $S_8 = 0.794^{+0.029}_{-0.027}$, $\Omega_m = 0.279^{+0.043}_{-0.022}$, and $w=-0.80^{+0.20}_{-0.22}$ at 68% CL. The precision of these DES Y1 results rivals that from the Planck cosmic microwave background measurements, allowing a comparison of structure in the very early and late Universe on equal terms. Although the DES Y1 best-fit values for $S_8$ and $\Omega_m$ are lower than the central values from Planck ...

Paper PDF

This paper's license is marked as closed access or non-commercial and cannot be viewed on ResearchHub. Visit the paper's external site.