Abstract Background The randomised STROKE-AF trial demonstrated clinical effectiveness of continuous cardiac monitoring to detect atrial fibrillation (AF) with insertable cardiac monitors (ICMs) for patients with ischemic stroke attributed to large-artery or small-vessel disease (LAD/SVD). ICMs were ten-fold more effective at detecting AF compared to the standard of care (SoC). However, cost-effectiveness of this monitoring strategy is unknown. Purpose The aim of this economic evaluation was to assess the cost-effectiveness of long-term continuous cardiac monitoring via ICMs, for detection of AF (and, in event of AF diagnosis, subsequent anticoagulation), in patients with ischemic stroke attributed to large-or-small vessel disease compared to the SoC of conventional follow up in the United Kingdom. Methods We constructed a Markov model with a cycle length of three months and a lifetime horizon to conduct the cost-effectiveness analysis, from the National Health Service (NHS) perspective. Costs and health-related benefits were discounted at an annual rate of 3.5%. We expressed outcomes in terms of quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs). Patient characteristics in the analysis and detection probabilities were based on the STROKE-AF trial. Detection of AF resulted in a switch in treatment from antiplatelet to direct oral anticoagulant (DOAC). Risk of cerebrovascular events were dependent on a patient’s AF detection status and subsequent treatment. Scenario, deterministic, and probabilistic sensitivity analyses were conducted to test the robustness of the base-case incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) and account for uncertainties in the model. We stratified patients into risk groups based on CHA2DS2-VASc scores and risk of AF detection. Results The base case incremental cost-effectiveness ratio of the implantation of an ICM was £15,485 per QALY, substantially under the NICE willingness-to-pay threshold of £20,000-£30,000 per QALY. ICM implantations resulted in 0.139 QALYs gained per patient at an incremental cost of £2,147. There were 0.054 fewer stroke events per patient in the ICM arm versus SoC. Results were robust under sensitivity analysis. Conclusion ICMs were cost-effective compared to SoC for detection of AF in patients with LAD/SVD stroke in the United Kingdom driven largely by more stroke events avoided. Subgroup analysis showed that ICMs were more cost-effective in patients with higher CHA2DS2-VASc scores and those with a higher individual risk of AF.Markov Model SchematicSummary ICER Results and Events avoided

Cost-effectiveness of atrial fibrillation detection with insertable cardiac monitors in large-artery or small-vessel disease stroke in the United Kingdom