Paper
Document
Download
Flag content
0

Homology of Escherichia coli isolated from urine and vagina and their antimicrobial susceptibility in postmenopausal women with recurrent cystitis

Save
TipTip
Document
Download
Flag content
0
TipTip
Save
Document
Download
Flag content

Abstract

Uropathogenic Escherichia coli (UPEC) is a typical cystitis-causing organism that can migrate from the vagina to the bladder and cause recurrent cystitis (RC). Few reports have compared the characteristics of urinary and vaginal UPEC in patients with RC. We carried out molecular biological analyses of Escherichia coli (E. coli) strains and their antimicrobial susceptibility to assess the association between urinary and vaginally UPEC. We included E. coli isolated from urinary and vaginal samples at the onset of cystitis in postmenopausal women with RC between 2014 and 2019 in our hospital. Pulsed-field gel electrophoresis (PFGE) was performed using a restriction enzyme (Xba I). These sequences were compared with 17 antimicrobial susceptibilities determined by a micro-liquid dilution method. Multilocus sequence typing (MLST) and classification of extended-spectrum β-lactamase (ESBL) genotypes by multiplex polymerase chain reaction (PCR) were performed on ESBL-producing E. coli. We analyzed 14 specimens (each seven urine and vaginal) from seven patients in total. On PFGE, the similarity of urinary and vaginal E. coli per patient ranged from 89.5 to 100 %, including four patients with 100 % matches. MLST demonstrated that 29 % (4/14 specimens) were strain sequence type 131. Two specimens contained ESBL-producing strains and identified the CTX-M-27 genotype for each specimen. For each patient, antimicrobial susceptibilities between urinary and vaginal E. coli were mostly identical. Thus, urinary- and vaginally-derived E. coli were identical in postmenopausal women with RC. Management targeting both urinary and vaginal UPEC is essential for RC, indicating the importance of a vagina-targeted approach.

Paper PDF

This paper's license is marked as closed access or non-commercial and cannot be viewed on ResearchHub. Visit the paper's external site.